More C type errors by default for GCC 14

Alexander Monakov amonakov@ispras.ru
Tue May 16 10:39:26 GMT 2023


On Tue, 16 May 2023, Florian Weimer wrote:

> > (FWIW: no, this should not be an error, a warning is fine, and I actually 
> > think the current state of it not being in Wall is the right thing as 
> > well)

(this is mixed up, -Wpointer-sign is in fact enabled by -Wall)

> I don't understand why we do not warn by default and warn with -Wall.  I
> would expect this to be either a documented extension (no warning with
> -Wall), or a warning by default (because it's a conformance issue).  Is
> there any conformance issue that is treated in the same way?

Another one is -Wpointer-arith (pointer arithmetic on 'void *').

Alexander


More information about the Gcc mailing list