More C type errors by default for GCC 14
Sam James
sam@gentoo.org
Fri May 12 21:21:18 GMT 2023
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> [...]
> In summary, all these seems to be good candidates for errors by default:
>
> * int-conversion as errors (already raised separately
> * -Wint-conversion for ?:
> * parameter names in non-prototype function declarations
> * the union wait function pointer compatibility kludge
> * return-with-out-value for non-void functions
> * -Wincomatible-pointer-types warning for ?: (but no error yet, see below)
>
> This are more “maybe“:
>
> * incompatible-pointer-types as errors (already raised separately)
> * int-conversion and incompatible-pointer-types in comparisons
> * return with value in a function returning void
-Wreturn-type tends to bite people with C++. Obviously the behaviour
is different for C, but it's a serious code smell. I've been playing
with it for C for a while and I don't get that many hits with it of
this type.
> * dereferencing void *
> * taking the address of void
I think I've seen these but they've been accompanied by other issues.
> * "function types not truly compatible in ISO C"
> and "types are not quite compatible" (depending on what they actually mean)
> * qualifier mismatches (may need separate opt-out)
This has been common for func. ptrs. but not too bad. I haven't
got any data on other cases but am a bit worried about how noisy it'll
be for those.
> * sign mismatches in pointers (definitely needs separate opt-out)
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 377 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20230512/94742f86/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list