More C type errors by default for GCC 14

[Sam James]

Eli Zaretskii via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:05 +0200
>> From: Arsen Arsenović via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
>> 
>> You're actively dismissing the benefit.
>
> Which benefit?
>
> No one has yet explained why a warning about this is not enough, and
> why it must be made an error.  Florian's initial post doesn't explain
> that, and none of the followups did, although questions about whether
> a warning is not already sufficient were asked.
>
> That's a simple question, and unless answered with valid arguments,
> the proposal cannot make sense to me, at least.

My email covers this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-May/241269.html.

I'd also note that some of the issues I've seen were already flagged
in people's CI but they didn't notice because it was just a warning.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 377 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20230509/f6f0f640/attachment.sig>