Naming flag for specifying the output file name for Binary Module Interface files

Wed Dec 7 16:29:16 GMT 2022

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 16:18:00 +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> I think it is reasonable to include c++ in the spelling, since other languages supported by
> GCC (and clang in due course) have modules.

Especially given that Fortran doesn't necessarily have one module to
output; Fortran sources can contain many such modules (though they tend
to be looked up via include paths, so they are actually implicit builds
today; that may change if/when Fortran adopts P1689 as well).


More information about the Gcc mailing list