Relation between gcc version and libstdc++ version
Anton Wöllert
a.woellert@gmail.com
Tue Aug 30 18:46:48 GMT 2022
Thanks for your comments,
sorry for posting on the wrong mailing list. I'll just restate my
initial question here on gcc-help again:
I was trying to build a cross-compilation toolchain for a specific
target using a newer GCC version, than the one that the binaries
were build on the target.
The C part seems to work well, but the C++ part doesn't. It seems
that the G++ ships it's own libstdc++ include headers. If this
libstdc++ is newer than the one one the target, I get undefined
references (because there are some newer implementation details and
things like that). Is it possible to tell G++/GCC to use the
libstdc++.so from the target and also to use the C++ headers (like
iostream) from the target?
If not, is there any reason this is hard-coded?
With clang it looks like you can specify "any" libstdc++ version you
want, although I haven't tested it yet.
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 18:21 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This doesn't belong on this mailing list though, please use the gcc-
> help list instead.
>
> This list is for discussion of GCC development, not help using it.
>
>
> > > C++ in general
> > > tries to be very good in backward compatibility.
> > > This essentially means that you can't use newer compilers with
> > > more
> > > features/bugfixes to compile software for older targets.
> >
> >
> > No it doesn't. Using new compilers on older machines works fine.
> > You just need to do it right.
> >
So what is the right way to compile software with a newer version of
gcc for a target, that has an older version of gcc? I can't find any
hints about that in documentation. Should I ship the newer
libstdc++.so with the application to the target and set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Then I probably also have to add other libraries,
right?
Kind regards,
Anton
More information about the Gcc
mailing list