[libc-coord] Add new ABI '__memcmpeq()' to libc
enh
enh@google.com
Thu Sep 16 20:55:43 GMT 2021
(Android libc maintainer.)
should __memcmpeq be in compiler-rt rather than libc?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:35 PM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021, Chris Kennelly wrote:
>
> > In terms of relying on the feature: If __memcmpeq is ever exposed as an
> a
> > simple alias for memcmp (since the notes mention that it's a valid
> > implementation), does that open up the possibility of depending on the
> > bcmp-like behavior that we were trying to escape?
>
> The proposal is as an ABI only (compilers would generate calls to
> __memcmpeq from boolean uses of memcmp, users wouldn't write calls to
> __memcmpeq directly, __memcmpeq wouldn't be declared in installed libc
> headers). If such dependence arises, that would suggest a compiler bug
> wrongly generating such calls for non-boolean memcmp uses.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list