On(c)e more: optimizer failure

[Stefan Kanthak]

Gabriel Ravier <gabravier@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/23/21 3:46 PM, Stefan Kanthak wrote:

>> JFTR: do you consider your wild speculations to be on-topic here?
>
> I suppose I should apologize: I did not intend to make any accusations 
> here.

No need to, I can stand a little heat.

[...]

> I also had been rather angered by you saying "You should better implement
> such missing optimisations your users might expect from a mature compiler"
> which I misinterpreted (at least, I hope so) as being some kind of threat.

You did (the misinterpretation).
This was my direct reply to Jakub's
| You should file missed optimizations into gcc bugzilla where they can be
| seen any time.
Read it as "You should implement missing optimisations (independent from
a bug report) so your users get better code all the time."
The emphasis is on "You should" as well as "all the time."

Stefan