GCC association with the FSF

[Chris Punches]

That will never make it appropriate.

I would encourage you to reflect more carefully on the meaning of the
words you are reading and using.

These arguments are paper thin, and full of lofty rhetoric; none of
them will expand the expectation of anyone here to include integrating
their poltical beliefs into the GCC project roadmap beyond its
technical and licensing goals.

I would encourage anyone reading this to start treating this discussion
as off-topic disruption for the GCC SC.

-C

On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 4/11/21 9:34 PM, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
> 
> > It is not appropriate to discuss the removal of someone based on
> > innuendo, provenly false smearing, and other types of political
> > maneuvering at the behest of corporations desiring the destruction
> > of
> > the very projects they are sponsoring.
> 
> Good job that's not what is happening then.
> 
> > It is not appropriate to even suggest to blackmail sponsor or non-
> > sponsor organizations by cutting ties with them to force someone
> > that a
> > couple corporates in your group don't like out of their
> > organization.
> >   I call on those of you who argued this to restore credibility and
> > integrity to this discussion.
> 
> People, and companies can chose to support whatever organizations
> they desire, 
> and they can chose to withdraw such support.  For what ever reasons
> they may have.
> 
> nathan
> 
>