GCC association with the FSF
David Malcolm
dmalcolm@redhat.com
Wed Apr 7 15:15:14 GMT 2021
On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 10:51 -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt via Gcc wrote:
> [...] That "gnu-stucture" document was written by RMS a couple of
> months ago and doesn't represent how the GNU project and its
> maintainers have worked for years.
>
> It reflects the same message that has been sent to new GNU
> maintainers
> for the decades. The GNU structure and organization document
> (https://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-structure.en.html) is basically a
> reflection of that, and how we have been doing things for decades.
"We've always done it this way" is not necessarily a good defence of an
existing practice.
> You can raise any issues you think do not reflect on the lists, or
> with the GNU Advisory Committee.
>
> RMS indeed claims to be the "Chief GNUisance" of the GNU project
> and
> that that title somehow makes him the leader of the project and
> that
> he appoints GNU maintainers.
>
> That is true, RMS appoints which projects become GNU projects or not,
> and who maintains them. And as maintainers we have a lot of freedom,
> as
> can be seen here, and elsewhere.
What you're describing sounds like a dictatorship to me.
>
> The GNU Assembly is having a similar
> discussion right now
>
> It should be noted that this group is not associated with the GNU
> project, or represents it in anyway, despite pretending to.
I don't think you get to speak for who is or is not a member of the GNU
project. As far as I know, "GNU" isn't trademarked.
My opinions, not my employer's, as usual
Dave
More information about the Gcc
mailing list