Should the `expand` functions in builtin.c generate MEM patterns with ptr_mode addresses (instead of Pmode)
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Wed Jul 1 17:27:57 GMT 2020
On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 11:19 +0100, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I asked on IRC on Monday but since it didn't get any responses and the
> mailing list doesn't require someone paying attention at the moment I
> ask I'm asking here too.
>
>
> I've seen that `expand_builtin_init_trampoline` generates a
> `gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, ...)` on something returned from `expand_normal`.
>
> On AArch64 with `-mabi=ilp32` the address from `expand_normal` is in
> `ptr_mode` which is SImode.
>
> This means the RTX the backend gets is something like `(mem:BLK (reg:SI
> ...))`
>
>
> Since Pmode is DImode in the AArch64 backend, this is a little awkward
> to deal with.
> The current code works with `ptr_mode`, but it calls a function path
> which ICE's on a larger trampoline size.
>
>
> Many other functions in builtins.c generate MEM patterns with a Pmode
> address by either using `convert_memory_address` (like
> expand_builtin_nonlocal_goto and expand_builtin_atomic_compare_exchange)
> or using `memory_address` through `get_mem_rtx` (like
> expand_builtin_strncpy, expand_movstr, or expand_builtin_memory_copy_args).
>
>
> Is this generation of such MEM patterns with ptr_mode rather than Pmode
> in expand_builtin_init_trampoline and expand_builtin_init_descriptor
> deliberate, or should we change them?
> (Note I guess that passing a different mode to the backends might cause
> ICE's that will need to be fixed on a few different targets -- it would
> on AArch64).
In general, most things should be using Pmode. However, you have to be careful
when you're dealing with the memory storage vs an address we're actually going to
use in a memory dereference, pointer arithmetic, etc. This distinction comes up
in trampolines because they have to pull a pointer out of memory, then use it.
So there's some parts that use ptr_mode and others in Pmode.
Few targets have to deal with this stuff, so it's a bit fragile and not terribly
well documented.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list