Do we want to add -fsanitize=function?

Martin Liška
Wed Jan 15 10:59:00 GMT 2020

On 1/14/20 4:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:15:54PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 1/14/20 3:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> But then the compiler should just fail if you mix the two, rather than
>>> emitting something that doesn't work at all.
>>> Or better fix the design, so that it can grok an endbr64 together with
>>> the following jump as another magic.
>> Sure. One can make an error when these 2 options are mixed together.
>> So the question still remains opened, do we want to implement the
>> sanitizer feature?
> IMHO not for GCC 10, for GCC 11, it really sounds too hackish, so unsure.

That's my impression as well that the selected approach is quite a hack.
So unless somebody is really interested I'm not planning to work
on that for GCC 11.


> It should at least cover more than one arch and have these issues like CET
> etc. discussed upstream.
> 	Jakub

More information about the Gcc mailing list