What to do with argument mismatches in Fortran (was: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 91443)
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Tue Aug 20 20:12:00 GMT 2019
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:56:27PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Committed as r274551.
>
> Well, this revision appears to have woken quite a few bugs from their
> slumber. While argument mismatch was always illegal, it seems to have
> been a common idiom at one time. And, like almost all bad habits of
> the past, SPEC also has this (see PR 91473, where you can see thatt a
> rather large number of SPEC tests now require -std=legacy).
>
> So, what to do? Is -std=legacy the right option, or should we add
> something different (like -faccept-argument-mismatch), which we
> could then set by -std=legacy? And is there anything special
> we should be doing after we have diagnoses the problem, if the
> user simply wants to run the code?
Perhaps, something along the lines of -fallow-invalid-boz
I recently introduced. Issue an error be default, but
have -fallow-argument-mismatch downgrades the error to a
warning. The only way to disable the warning is with -w.
Personally, if gfortran can detect an error in code, I think
it should report the error to the user.
--
Steve
More information about the Gcc
mailing list