GCC 8 vs. GCC 9 speed and size comparison

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 09:56:00 GMT 2019


On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:53 AM Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> > Yes, except kdecore.cc I used in all cases .ii pre-processed files. I'm
> > going to start using kdecore.ii as well.
>
> If the kdecore.cc is the one from me it's also preprocessed and doesn't
> contain any #include directives, I just edited it somewhat to be
> compilable for different architecture.

Btw, the tramp3d sources on our testers _do_ contain #include directives.

Richard.

>
> Ciao,
> Michael.
>
> >
> > As Honza pointed out in the email that hasn't reached this mailing list
> > due to file size, there's a significant change in inline-unit-growth. The param
> > has changed from 20 to 40 for GCC 9. Using --param inline-unit-growth=20 for all
> > benchmarks, I see green numbres for GCC 9!
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Michael.
> > >
> >
> >



More information about the Gcc mailing list