non-volatile automatic variables in setjmp tests

[Richard Biener]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:31 PM Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > Not sure if in this case we run into an RTL optimization that breaks things
> > (PRE / scheduling / invariant motion are candidates).
>
> That's true, what Josef sees might point to a genuine bug in the
> middle-end observed only on msp430; but we do want to make this situation
> work generally, as required by ISO C, not like how it's spelled in our
> manual.

Yes, and there's at least one existing bug, PR57067 for which it was
observed the scheduler genrates wrong-code.

Richard.

>
> Ciao,
> Michael.