[wwwdocs] Typo in description of __builtin_expect_with_probability
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Tue Oct 30 10:14:00 GMT 2018
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:11:00AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> In
>
> DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_3 (BT_FN_LONG_LONG_LONG_DOUBLE,
> BT_LONG, BT_LONG, BT_LONG, BT_DOUBLE)
>
>
> doesn't the first LONG refer to the return type, so that the third
> argument just has type double? Other than that, your suggested update
Yes. A long double argument would be BT_LONGDOUBLE or written as _LONGDOUBLE
in the name of the fn type.
Jakub
More information about the Gcc
mailing list