PING: Re: Fixing Bug Id 66074

Fri Nov 16 13:05:00 GMT 2018

On 2018-11-06 2:05 p.m., nick wrote:
> Greetings all,
> I am wondering why this bug is only for the function reported:
> Seems there are lots of other functions in that file that could
> use the exact same  optimization, would it be better to rewrite
> the file to use the void object pointer for all functions that 
> can use a secondary version for that so this would touch the 
> function, gcc_jit_result_get_global as an example as it looks 
> similar enough i.e. same function arguments. Due to this I am
> assuming all non error functions in this file should be rewritten
> this.
> Thanks and I will send a patch if that's the case,
> Nick

Greetings all, 

I am not heard back on whether I should continue or this is the correct
approach to fixing this bug.



More information about the Gcc mailing list