Selective scheduling and its usage

[Richard Biener]

On March 29, 2018 5:14:42 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Are you suggesting we should not care about regressions with features
>> that are not enabled by default or which are only exposed with
>> "non-standard" flags?  The current scheme on which bugs get P1/P2/P4+
>> assigned is quite simple...
>
>I'm only suggesting keeping them at P3, which is not "don't care" as
>far as I 
>know but just the default priority.  The criterion could be a flag that
>is not 
>part of any -Ox switches and not enabled on any primary+secondary
>platforms.

That's basically having primary / secondary / rest passes (or command line switches) which we would need to document as such. Let's discuss this at the Cauldron - I'm certainly not going to block the release over a selective scheduling bug...

Richard.