libstdc++ bootstrap failure after r261525

François Dumont frs.dumont@gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 19:16:00 GMT 2018


I pick up the wrong "can_advance" patch. I should have taken another one 
first.

So I'll send and apply the missing one providing the debug __can_advance 
in a couple of hours.

Sorry


On 13/06/2018 15:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 13/06/18 13:42 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13/06/2018 08:11, François Dumont wrote:
>>> On 12/06/2018 23:26, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>> Bootstrap fails in libstdc++ with the following error.
>>>> I haven't investigated it much except to take a peek
>>>> at recent libstdc++ commits where r261525 looks like it
>>>> introduced __glibcxx_check_can_increment_range, so it
>>>> seems like it might have something to do with it.  I don't
>>>> see a __glibcxx_requires_can_increment_range macro defined
>>>> anywhere in the patch so maybe it's a typo?  Francois, can
>>>> you please see what's going on?
>>>>
>>>> /opt/notnfs/msebor/build/gcc-86114/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:452:45: 
>>>> error: ‘__glibcxx_requires_can_increment_range’ was not declared in 
>>>> this scope
>>>>        __glibcxx_requires_can_increment_range(__first, __last, 
>>>> __result);
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Martin
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> I had missed the fact that the patch didn't apply correctly on 
>>> include/debug/debug.h as stated in the ChangeLog entry.
>>>
>>> It is fixed now.
>> But even after r261537 we are seeing the regressions:
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/warn/pr31246.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/warn/pr31246.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/warn/pr31246.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
>>
>> Which definitely are related.
>
> And failing Debug Mode tests:
>
> FAIL: 20_util/hash/84998.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 23_containers/vector/cons/destructible_debug_neg.cc (test for 
> excess errors)
> FAIL: 25_algorithms/binary_search/partitioned.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 25_algorithms/equal_range/partitioned.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 25_algorithms/lexicographical_compare/71545.cc (test for excess 
> errors)
> FAIL: 25_algorithms/lower_bound/partitioned.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 25_algorithms/upper_bound/partitioned.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: ext/profile/mutex_extensions_neg.cc (test for excess errors)
>
> The logs show:
>
> /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:452: 
> error: '__can_advance' is not a member of '__gnu_debug'
> /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:484: 
> error: '__can_advance' is not a member of '__gnu_debug'
> /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:629: 
> error: '__can_advance' is not a member of '__gnu_debug'
> /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:664: 
> error: '__can_advance' is not a member of '__gnu_debug'
>
>
>
>



More information about the Gcc mailing list