Status of m32c target?

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
Mon Jan 15 12:39:00 GMT 2018


On 13/01/18 00:16, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 04:07 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>> I was going to suggest deprecation for gcc-8 given how badly it was
>>> broken in gcc-7 and the lack of maintenance on the target.
>> While we're considering deprecations, what happened to the idea of setting
>> a timescale by which cc0 targets need to be converted away from cc0 or be
>> removed?
> I don't think we ever really hashed through what that might look like.
>
> I'd be comfortable saying gcc-8 is the deprecation point.  I know some
> folks won't like that (someone already said so WRT the m68k, but didn't
> step up to do the conversion), but I think that unless we set a point
> nothing is likely to happen.

How much work is it to convert the m68k to LRA. Is this person days, 
weeks, months or years?

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.



More information about the Gcc mailing list