Nested-Functions

[nick]

On 2018-01-03 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
> Â By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken, they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a syntactic sugar syntax.
> 
> Austin 
> 

That's the same thing actually if your going to name your lambda. What are the advantages
of this newer syntax or feature. Do you have any examples?

Nick
> On Jan 3, 2018 2:44 PM, "nick" <xerofoify@gmail.com <mailto:xerofoify@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>     > On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote:
>     >> Why would dont add it at GNU G++?
>     >
>     > Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible?
>     >
> 
>     It depends actually, lambdas are consider the  C++ standard of this. I am wondering what
>     you mean Alexsandir and what is your use case as lambdas tryto solve this for most use
>     cases of antonymous and nested functions. What are the requirements if any that lambdas
>     don't meant and have you looked at the C++14/17 standard for them if your compiler
>     supports it.
> 
>     What do you mean by nested functions actually as that means a lot
>     of things in compiler or language development.
> 
>     Cheers,
>     Nick
> 
>