Types of operands in a gimple equality operation

[Jeff Law]

On 11/13/2017 01:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:

>> Huh, that bites.  Im surprised we don't just make those places produce a
>> cast, or just introduce an explicit cast of the (void *)0 during the
>> expression building process.
> 
> I'm quite sure we could relax the above now given we have gimple_call_fntype
> to preserve the original function type.  But I don't remember what broke and
> exactly why on those pesky fn descriptor targets.  These days I only know
> about IA64.
It could well have been a PA-ism at the time.  I can recall looking at
some of this stuff, but none of the details.

jeff