Question about dump_printf/dump_printf_loc
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com
Fri May 5 22:37:00 GMT 2017
I have a simple question about dump_printf and dump_printf_loc. I notice
that most (all?) of the uses of these function are of the form:
if (dump_enabled_p ())
dump_printf_loc (MSG_*, ......);
Since dump_enabled_p() is just checking to see if dump_file or alt_dump_file
is set and since dump_printf_loc has checks for these as well, is there
any reason why we shouldn't or couldn't just use:
dump_printf_loc (MSG_*, ......);
with out the call to dump_enabled_p and have the dump function do nothing
when there is no dump file set? I suppose the first version would have
some performance advantage since dump_enabled_p is an inlined function,
but is that enough of a reason to do it? The second version seems like
it would look cleaner in the code where we are making these calls.
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list