GCC 5.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com
Tue May 31 11:20:00 GMT 2016
On 31/05/16 12:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 27/05/16 12:43, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> The first release candidate for GCC 5.4 is available from
>>>
>>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5.4.0-RC-20160527
>>>
>>> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 236809.
>>>
>>> I have sofar bootstrapped the release candidate on x86_64-suse-linux-gnu.
>>>
>>> Please test the release candidate and report any issues to bugzilla.
>>>
>>> If all goes well I'd like to release GCC 5.4 at the beginning of next
>>> week.
>>>
>> Bootstrap and test on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf looks fine.
>> Unfortunately, on aarch64-none-linux-gnu I noticed a regression compared to
>> GCC 5.3:
>> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c scan-assembler-times bif\\tv 1
>>
>> This is PR 68696 that has been triggered on that branch.
>> The patch fixing that is at:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00826.html
>>
>> I have bootstrapped and tested it on aarch64-none-linux-gnu on top of the 5.4
>> RC
>> and it fixes the regression. It applies cleanly to that branch.
>>
>> Is it okay to backport it to the branch?
> While it doesn't look like having the same cause (r231178) the patch
> looks safe to me to backport.
Indeed, the bug is a missing pattern in the backend that ends up
with us relying on xor+and sequences being emitted in a certain order
after the tree passes, so it can be triggered by any of a number of tree-level
changes.
> Thus, ok.
Thanks,
I'll commit it shortly.
Kyrill
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Kyrill
>>
>>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list