Question about how to fix PR69052
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Tue Jan 26 16:26:00 GMT 2016
On 01/26/2016 02:28 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Yes, loop invariant now increased invariant cost if the invariant
> can't be propagated into address expression. Problem is we check
> propagation by simply replacing use with def in memory reference then
> verifying result insn with verify_changes. Apparently more advanced
> transforms are necessary, just like what combine does.
> I am surprised that rtl_fwprop_addr doesn't handle this either, it's
> an exact address expression propagation example.
So the question now becomes whether or not the work done by combine.c is
dependent on knowledge that is specific to combine or is it just a
series of transformations that we could make available (preferably
moving it to simplify-rtx).
If we can factor the transformation out and shove it into simplify-rtx,
then it could be used elsewhere.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list