reload question about unmet constraints

[Jim Wilson]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> In that case, you might be able to fix the bug by splitting the
> offending insns into two patterns, one only handling near mems
> and one handling one far mems, where the near/far-ness of the mem
> is verified by the *predicate* and not the constraints.

That is how it works currently.  He was trying to optimize a case that
involved mixed near and far mems and hence couldn't use a predicate in
that case.

Jim