C++ order of evaluation of operands, arguments

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 25 November 2015 at 19:38,  <Paul_Koning@dell.com> wrote:
> I'm really wondering about this proposal.  It seems that it could affect optimization.  It also seems to be a precedent that may not be a good one to set.  Consider the dozen or so "undefined behavior" examples in https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/ub:apsys12.pdf -- would the committee want to remove ALL of those?

No.

I'm not aware of any suggestion to remove ANY of those.