basic asm and memory clobbers
Paul_Koning@Dell.com
Paul_Koning@Dell.com
Fri Nov 20 19:39:00 GMT 2015
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2015 06:05 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> ...
>> It seems to me that it would be better to remove the feature, forcing
>> what must be an extremely small number of users to audit and update to
>> extended asm.
> That might be a little drastic. Though if we want to go this direction, the first step is to deprecate for a major release cycle. It would be interesting to see how much stuff would complain/break.
I would expect: a lot. I've seen plenty of people writing asm statements (in small quantities, admittedly) who have never heard of extended asm.
paul
More information about the Gcc
mailing list