basic asm and memory clobbers
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Fri Nov 20 16:41:00 GMT 2015
On 11/20/2015 04:14 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 20/11/15 10:37, David Wohlferd wrote:
>> The intent for 24414 is to change basic asm such that it will become
>> (quoting jeff) "an opaque blob that read/write/clobber any register or
>> memory location." Such being the case, "memory" is not sufficient:
>>
>> #define CLOBBERALL "eax", "ebx", "ecx", "edx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",
>> "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "edi", "esi", "ebp", "cc", "memory"
>
> Hmm. I would not be at all surprised to see this cause reload
> failures. You certainly shouldn't clobber the frame pointer on
> any machine which needs one.
Right. It'll cause other issues as well. It's the only reason why I
didn't change the code internally to stomp every hard register back in 1999.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list