Elementary question about complete_type vs tsubst_flags_t
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Fri Jul 10 14:02:00 GMT 2015
On 07/10/2015 09:52 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Good. Thus in practice the "immediate context" theory boils down to
> those irrevocable instantiations, that wasn't completely clear to me,
> thanks.
Right.
> Does that imply that c++/62085 should be closed?
I think so, yes.
> The compilers I have
> here aren't all in agreement: EDG rejects the testcase like GCC but
> recent clangs don't, likewise SolarisStudio.
Well, the standard gives implementations some latitude to avoid
instantiations if it can figure out another way to determine the winning
candidate: see 14.7.1p7. I don't know if that's the basis for the
difference.
Jason
More information about the Gcc
mailing list