GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support?
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Fri Jul 10 08:41:00 GMT 2015
On 09/07/15 23:17, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> (this is triggered by a question on the Ocaml mailing list asking about
> SystemZ backend in Ocaml; SystemZ is today a backend for GCC & probably
> GCCJIT)
>
> We might want to support better good garbage collection schemes in GCC,
> particularily in GCCJIT. This is a
> thing that LLVM is known to be weak at, and we might aim to do much
> better. If we did, good frontends for
> good functional languages (e.g. F#, Ocaml, Haskell) might in the future
> profit of GCC technology. And even a Javascript engine based on GCCJIT
> could profit.
>
> A good GC is very probably a precise (sometimes generational copying) GC
> with write barriers
> (read the http://gchandbook.org/ for more, or at least the wikipage
> about garbage collection). So a good GC is changing pointers.
>
> So we need to know where, and provide a mechanism for, pointer values
> are located in the call stack (of the GCCJIT generated code), and
> probably provide some write barrier machinery.
It's going to be very hard. All our experience with GCJ shows that a
true precise GC in GCC is going to require major surgery in many
places. The HotSpot optimizing compilers are written with GC as a
basic requirement and it touches many places.
Andrew.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list