pass_stdarg problem when run after pass_lim

[Tom de Vries]

On 30-01-15 09:41, Richard Biener wrote:
> I don't like adding more hacks to aid the stdarg pass.
> It's not required
> for GCC 5 anyway and for GCC 6 we should push the lowering change.

Richard,

I agree that that's the best solution (the posted patch is just a solution that 
helps me along for now).

> Maybe you want to pick up the work?

In principle yes, depending on the amount of work (at this point I have no idea 
what remains to be done and how long that would take me).

Michael, are your patches posted somewhere?

Thanks,
- Tom