C++ Standard Question

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 23/01/15 10:53 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>Is there a better way to automate a signature compliance? To tweak
>what they have done?

Testing member function signatures for compliance is inherently
flawed, they just shouldn't do it.

I would say they should be testing that the function can be called on
a non-const object and that it behaves as specified, rather than
testing for a specific signature.