msan and gcc ?

Toon Moene toon@moene.org
Wed Oct 1 18:38:00 GMT 2014


On 10/01/2014 08:00 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> -gcc folks.
>
> Why not use clang then?
> It offers many more nice features.

What's the Fortran front-end called for clang (or do you really think we 
are going to write Weather Forecasting codes in C :-) )

Kind regards,

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Toon Moene <toon@moene.org> wrote:
>> On 10/01/2014 06:21 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
>>
>>>> it was certainly worth it.
>>>
>>>
>>> since I see msan as a kind of valgrind replacement (similar functionality,
>>> but ~10x the speed, partially at the cost of more difficult deployment), I
>>> did a quick search in gcc bugzilla. 982 PRs mention valgrind, so such
>>> functionality is clearly heavily used.
>>
>>
>> That would be interesting - valgrind is certainly impossible to use on our
>> Weather Forecasting code (far too large, as valgrind helpfully points out).
>>
>> --
>> Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
>> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
>> At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
>> Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
>


-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news



More information about the Gcc mailing list