Query about the TREE_TYPE field

[Jeff Law]

On 11/18/14 09:30, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> I tried doing the if before chaning to TREE_TYPE...  absolutely no
> effect on the testsuite or anything else :-)
>
> What do you think, should I check this in?   What is there is clearly
> incorrect.    we could also revert the original patch since that is what
> the code base is effectively is doing at the moment...
What I tend to do in these situations is roll back to the version prior 
to the "fix" and try the testcase with that compiler.  Then I can walk 
through under GDB control to find out whatever I need.

Clearly something needs to change here, but the question is what :-) 
And I think rolling back and debugging that compiler is the best way to 
know get more information to allow this to move forward.

Jeff