RFC: Update ISL under gcc/infrastructure/ ? // Remove CLooG?

Tobias Grosser tobias@grosser.es
Thu Nov 6 19:58:00 GMT 2014


On 06.11.2014 20:08, Roman Gareev wrote:
>> As the ISL code generator has been default since a while and we did not get
>> many bug reports, the actual switch seems to have worked well. We could
>> probably still need some testing, but in this case it is most likely time to
>> drop the CLooG support entirely. Are you interested to provide the relevant
>> patches?
>>
>> Also, as Tobias suggested we should raise the minimal supported isl level to
>> 0.14 to be sure PR 62289 is fixed.
>
> Yes, if you don’t mind, I’ll try to provide them by the end of the
> week. I’m planning to make two patches: the first one removes files
> related to CLooG code generator, the second one removes support of
> CLooG library from configure and make files. What do you think about
> this?

Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently. 
Please also remember updating the documentation.

Cheers,
Tobias



More information about the Gcc mailing list