TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Thu Feb 20 20:57:00 GMT 2014

On 02/17/2014 03:55 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I also think we want explicit representation of types known to be local to compilation
> unit - anonymous namespaces in C/C++, types defined within function bodies in C and
> god knows what in Ada/Fortran/Java.

In the C++ front end we set TREE_PUBLIC appropriately on the TYPE_DECL 
of a named type.


More information about the Gcc mailing list