[RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:13:36PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Understood, but that doesn't explain why Paul wants to add ISB/isync
> instructions which affect the *CPU* rather than the compiler!

I doubt Paul wants it, but yeah, I'm curious about that proposal as
well, sounds like someone took a big toke from the bong again; it seems
a favourite past time amongst committees.