404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

[Olaf van der Spek]

On 29-12-2014 18:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>> The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is
>> our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03
>> support at this point?  One thing I can think of might be gcc bootstrap.
>
> The main difference is ABI stability, which is not guaranteed for
> C++11 (but should be once the std::string changes and resulting churn
> settle down).

Is std::string still being fixed? Will that fix be part of 5.0?
Are ABI concerns holding back other things as well?

Olaf