ASAN test failures make compare_tests useless
Yury Gribov
y.gribov@samsung.com
Mon Aug 18 05:43:00 GMT 2014
On 08/18/2014 09:42 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 08/16/2014 04:37 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> On the compile farm, ASAN tests seem to fail a lot like:
>>
>> FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern
>> test, is ==31166==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
>> 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) bytes at address 2008fff7000 (errno:
>> 12)
>> ==31166==ReserveShadowMemoryRange failed while trying to map
>> 0xdfff0001000 bytes. Perhaps you're using ulimit -v
>> , should match READ of size 1 at 0x[0-9a-f]+ thread T0.*(
>>
>> The problem is that those addresses and sizes are very random, so when
>> I compare the test results of a pristine trunk with a patched one, I
>> get:
>>
>> New tests that FAIL:
>>
>> unix//-m64: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output
>> pattern test, is ==12875==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
>> 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) bytes at address 2008fff7000 (errno:
>> 12)
>> unix//-m64: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output
>> pattern test, is ==18428==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
>> 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) bytes at address 2008fff7000 (errno:
>> 12)
>> [... hundreds of ASAN tests that failed...]
>>
>> Old tests that failed, that have disappeared: (Eeek!)
>>
>> unix//-m64: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output
>> pattern test, is ==30142==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
>> 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) bytes at address 2008fff7000 (errno:
>> 12)
>> unix//-m64: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output
>> pattern test, is ==31166==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
>> 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) bytes at address 2008fff7000 (errno:
>> 12)
>> [... the same hundreds of tests that already failed before...]
>>
>> The above makes very difficult to identify failures caused by my patch.
>>
>> Can we remove the "==...." part of the error? This way compare_tests
>> will ignore the failures.
>>
>> Alternatively, I could patch compare_tests to sed out that part before
>> comparing. Would that be acceptable?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Manuel.
>>
>
> Added Sanitizer folks. Frankly it'd be cool if dumping PIDs and
> addresses could be turned off.
>
Ok, this time actually added them.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list