fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
David Starner
prosfilaes@gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 04:50:00 GMT 2013
Sorry about the blank message; I accidentally hit the wrong button.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> It was "This is possible, but it's tricky, and it's really important
> to get it right. We don't want a half-arsed patch."
We've all seen cases where a quick patch is rejected in favor of a
hypothetical patch, and years down the road, the program still has the
problem. The people who blocked the quick patch, naturally, never
bothered trying to write the patch they wanted.
> That's a mistranslation. It means that there are other criteria
> beyond some people having trouble. Such as, we really want multilibs
> to be built.
Who is we here? And why do you really want multilibs built?
>> I think you should detect the issue as *soon as practical* and then
>> *ALWAYS* emit a message that *TELLS THE USER WHAT TO DO*.
>
> Yes! Yes! Yes!
Then what are we going to do about it? As per my first comment, nobody
has offered to produce a patch in the form you would be happy with, so
I'm not going to hold my breath that it's going to appear.
--
Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list