fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Thu Jul 25 08:17:00 GMT 2013
On 07/24/2013 11:51 PM, David Starner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Not at all: we're just disagreeing about what a real system with
>> a real workload looks like.
>
> No, we aren't. We're disagreeing about whether it's acceptable to
> enable a feature by default that breaks the compiler build half way
> through with an obscure error message.
No we aren't. I want that error message fixed too. A configure-
time warning would be good.
> Real systems need features that aren't enabled by default sometimes.
I *totally* agree.
>> It's a stupid thing to say anyway, because who is to say their
>> system is more real than mine or yours?
>
> By that logic, you've already said that any system needing GNAT is
> less real then others, because it's not enabled by default.
Absolutely not: you're the one making claims about "real systems and
real workloads". I made no such claims.
Andrew.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list