List of typos.

[Ondřej Bílka]

On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 07:54:34PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Ondrej Bilka schrieb:
> 
> >http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/gcc_misspell.patch
> 
> This is wrong:
> 
> @@ -10834,7 +10834,7 @@ avr_convert_to_type (tree type, tree expr)
>     XOP[2]  # Bytes to copy
> 
>     Return TRUE  if the expansion is accomplished.
> -   Return FALSE if the operand compination is not supported.  */
> +   Return FALSE if the operand compilation is not supported.  */
> 
> Should be "combination" not "compilation".
> 
> 
> index 406617f..c7a7f7b 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* Frv option-handling defitions.
> +/* Frv option-handling deviations.
> 
> Should be "definitions" instead of "deviations".
> 
> 
> -/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addresse symbol.
> +/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addressee symbol.
> 
> Is this correct or should be "far-address"?
> 
> 
> @@ -5336,7 +5336,7 @@ pa_print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
>  		   && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1)) == REG)
>  	    {
>  	      /* Because the REG_POINTER flag can get lost during reload,
> -		 pa_legitimate_address_p canonicalizes the order of the
> +		 pa_legitimate_address_p canonizes the order of the
> 
> I am not sure about this one and many others. "canonicalize" sounds
> ok to me, so does "canonicalization". "canonize" sounds odd to me.
> For example the following which should change none or both:
> 
> -/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonicalizing directory
> +/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonizing directory
> 
> -   * Unique vinsn derivates from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
> +   * Unique vinsn derivatives from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
> 
> Shouldn't this be "derives"?
> 
> 
> -      /* Merge c_expres found or unify live register sets from different
> +      /* Merge c_express found or unify live register sets from different
> 
> Some lines above in sel-sched.c there is "C_EXPRes". Again, change
> none or both (none seems fine here):
> 
oops it was bug, fixed.
> 
> -  /* Test exponentials and their signs.  A buggy lexer is more likely
> +  /* Test exponential and their signs.  A buggy lexer is more likely
> 
> Should both be plural or singular. "exponents" sounds good to me.
> 
it is also in string bellow so probably we need change or keep both.

> 
> -   Roger Sayle <...@eyesopen.com>
> +   Roger Sayle <...@eyes open.com>
> 
> Don't change email addresses!
bug, fixed