not-a-number's

[Robert Dewar]

On 1/16/2013 7:10 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:

> And as I have said before: if you are satisfied with the answer '2',
> then so be it and you keep the compiler the way it is, personally I'm am
> not able to accept changes to the sources anyway. I don't think it is
> the right answer though.

The fact that you don't think that gcc shoudl follow the C standard
is hardly convincing unless it is backed up by convincing technical
argument. I see nothing surprising about the 2 here, indeed any other
answer *would* be surprising. I still don't understand the basis for
your non-stnadard views.
>
> Mischa.
>