Normalizing the bitmap APIs.

Diego Novillo dnovillo@google.com
Thu Oct 11 19:16:00 GMT 2012


On 2012-10-11 13:26 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:

> My only other concern was that the mapping between those function
> names and the tasks to be done sometimes seemed less than obvious.
> So, I proposed the name change.  However, I think the current names
> are workable, assuming an acceptable solution to the above problem.

I would say, add both variants and make the empty ones drop the return 
value.  So, for instance, bitmap_ior returns a value, so make 
bitmap_ior_cg drop it.


Diego.



More information about the Gcc mailing list