Libgcc and its license

[Robert Dewar]

On 10/10/2012 4:16 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> I'm not talking about the relation between the headings textually located
> in a source file and the license of that source file.  I'm talking about
> the relation between the license of a .o file and the license of .h files
> #included at several levels of indirection from the .c source that was
> compiled to that .o file (in particular, headers included within tm.h, but
> most or all of the content of which is irrelevant for code being built for
> the target).

Right, I understand, but that gets messy quickly!
>