status of GCC & C++
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@google.com
Sun Mar 25 21:46:00 GMT 2012
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 17:36, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> The proposed coding guidelines have been published and will evolve
>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions). No point waiting to settle a
>> set of rules that will naturally change over time, as we start using it.
>
> That isn't what was decided when the transition to C++ was proposed though.
Really? To start *writing* in C++, sure we want at least an initial
version of the coding guidelines. I pointed to those, because they
look like a reasonable start.
To start *building* in C++, I do not think we need to agree on the
coding guidelines. We are already doing stages 2 and 3, doing stage 1
is a straightforward next step.
> It was agreed that a set of Coding Conventions would be published before the
> switch to C++. If you think that the above conventions are in good enough a
> shape to be proposed, then propose them for inclusion in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html
This needs to be done, yes. But not for simply building with C++.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list