Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

[Diego Novillo]

On 02/03/12 12:56 , Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Since no other GCC part is using C++ currently, I believe this would
> be rather poor first module choice to convert to C++. If C++ was
> already a non-optional requirement, then C++ conversion would be OK,

It already is.  We bootstrap in C++ mode.  I don't see a problem 
starting to move some code to C++.  Whether this is a good chunk of code 
to convert is another question.

Basile, I don't see a problem with your plan, in principle.


Diego.