ARM GCC 4.8 test suite

[Richard Earnshaw]

On 20/06/12 15:27, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> maybe it makes sense to look at some test suite comments since now all non EABI 
> configurations have been removed (is this correct?).
> 

No, not quite.  All configurations using the FPA have been removed.
That's not quite the same thing.

NetBSD is still supported (though it's not been tested in a while) and
that uses the ATPCS (or something quite close to it).

R.

> The problem was pointed out here:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00950.html
> 
> Here are some samples of the test suite (4.8-20120617):
> 
> gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/vaarg2.C:// { dg-options "-Wno-abi" { 
> target arm_eabi } }
> 
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm1.C:// { dg-do compile { target 
> arm*-*-eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
> 
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm2.C:// { dg-do compile { target 
> arm*-*-*eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
> 
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm3.C:// { dg-do compile { target 
> arm*-*-*eabi* } }
> 
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/arm_va_list.C:// { dg-require-effective-target arm_eabi }
> 
> Does it make sense to replace all "arm*-*-eabi*", "arm*-*-*eabi*", and 
> "arm*-*-symbianelf*" combinations with "arm_eabi"?
> 

I'll look at them when I get round to that part of the tools.  There's
still some clean-up work in the main part of the compiler to finish
before I move onto other parts.

R.