trouble emilinating redundant compares

[Paul S]

Thanks,

I was mistakenly only considering ports that defined 
TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS

Paul.

On 23/01/12 11:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 08:16 AM, Paul S wrote:
>    
>> Thanks H-P,
>>
>> That worked first time !
>>
>> For a few days I had been searching the non cc0 ports for hints. Two
>> of the ports don't bother using the set CC side effect to avoid
>> compares and the others are obfuscated by the fact that they
>> (understandably) use custom CC modes and the reload conditions aren't
>> obvious - even when I inspected the .c file CCmode tests.
>>      
> Don't look at i386 -- it doesn't use compare-elim.c.
> Look at the mn10300 and rx ports instead.
>
>
> r~
>
>
>