[trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes

[Patrick Marlier]

On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
>>> On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
>>> not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
>>> was fixed.
>>
>> What do you mean? Do you still see issues with Genome, even with the
>> returns-twice patch? If so, just on i686 or x86_64 too? With libitm?
> Sorry for confusion. Of course, I disabled your returns-twice patch. I
> patched at different places and I hope to figure out where is the
> problem and that it is not a side effect...
> I am currently testing on x86_64 with libitm.
>
> Patrick.
>

Attached the patch which makes genome works on my side on x86_64.
Torvald: could you tell me if it fixes the problem for you?

I did a regression test and no new failure (I should bootstrap and 
regtest again, I will do it once I have a feedback on this).

Thanks.
--
Patrick Marlier.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: draft_patch_genome5.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1845 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20120110/f4abae73/attachment.bin>